What was Dominique Strauss-Kahn wearing?

Yesterday Nafissatou Dialloagreed to settle” the civil lawsuit against prominent French politician Dominique Strauss-Kahn—she had accused him of sexual assault last year—for an undisclosed amount. Diallo has also settled a lawsuit against The New York Post. (The newspaper, without any evidence and citing “anonymous” sources, had reported that she worked as a prostitute.) After the settlement was announced, Diallo thanked the world and the skies, “I thank everybody, and I thank God.”

You know the story of Nafissatou Diallo already, and you know the story of the story, the ways in which much of the Western media, and in particular the U.S. and the French media, covered it. There’s no question who is the settler, that French guy, and who’s the native, “the African chambermaid.”

True to form, Reuters reported on Monday’s proceedings under the headline: “Strauss-Kahn, NYC hotel maid settle civil lawsuit over alleged assault.” The article names Strauss-Kahn four times, over the space of a sub-heading and three paragraphs, and names the judge in the case, Douglas McKeon, before whispering Nafissatou Diallo’s name. And here’s how Reuters introduces Nafissatou Diallo:

His accuser, Nafissatou Diallo, was present as the judge had ordered, wearing a green blouse with black pants and a gray and white scarf around her head.

Seriously? What matters is … what a woman wears? What do you think that French guy was wearing? Please, don’t answer.

The New York Times report isn’t much better, except that, thankfully, they don’t focus on wardrobe.

The AP mentions Diallo sort of quickly, in the second paragraph, and then can’t resist:

Strauss-Kahn did not attend the hearing on Monday at a Bronx courthouse. Diallo, her hair covered by a leopard-print scarf, looked composed and resolute as the deal was announced.

The Guardian as well mentions Diallo earlier, and then:

Dressed in a snow-leopard skin print headscarf and emerald blouse, she made no statement while in the courtroom. But in brief comments on the steps of the Bronx Supreme Court, Diallo, who was born in Guinea and who is the mother to a teenage girl, thanked her supporters.

The BBC actually mentioned Diallo in its second sentence, did not mention her clothing, and did end with this:

In the wake of Ms Diallo’s accusations, other women came forward with sexual assault allegations against him.

It’s worth noting that this miscoverage, a portmanteau that melds miscarriage and coverage, of this event is a fitting end to the International Human Rights Day and to the 16 Days of Activism Against Gender Violence.


7 thoughts on “What was Dominique Strauss-Kahn wearing?

  1. Thank you! Really irritating and enraging the way this story has been covered. Though there are perhaps real advantages for Diallo in NOT having her name be blasted across the news-o-sphere….

  2. Yup, everyone was fascinated by Diallo’s “snow leopard-print head scarf.” The Daily Beast went as far as to say that “Her working-woman’s hands flexed once then relaxed at her sides.” Lord. However, Huffington Post did say: “Several hours before the court date in New York, Strauss-Kahn was seen in Paris leaving his new residence in the Left Bank neighborhood of Montparnasse. Dressed in jeans, a white shirt and open black jacket and clutching a stack of dossiers, he ducked into a black Audi waiting for him. Asked by the AP whether he was relieved the New York end of his legal problems would soon be over, he refused to respond.” (http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/12/10/dominique-strauss-kahn-nyc-hotel-maid_n_2272391.html). Amazing.

  3. I’m trying to learn more about this story, particularly how it was reported, and wanted to inquire about a few things in the article. There is clearly some anger about the way this particular update to the story was reported in the media outlets you list, so I want to understand better.
    -Is the anger because her name was not mentioned enough times or higher up in the articles because she is a woman, or because she is not famous/well-known?
    -Regarding the wardrobe, is it not appropriate because DSK’s wardrobe wasn’t mentioned (except in the HuffPost article), or because it shouldn’t be mentioned at all?

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s