‘The African chambermaid’ and the media

I had said I wasn’t going to write no more pieces like this, no more pieces on the bad Western media and African women. I was wrong.

I had said I wasn’t going to write about the doggish reporting on that powerful wealthy white French guy, you know who, and the “African chambermaid in the posh hotel”, a kind of inversion of Heloise.

But then `reasonable’ people started claiming that the collapse of the case is a justification of the system, a victory for corroboration and justice. People started saying, “The system worked”. Reasonable people started writing that we should be thankful for the criminal justice system we have, well, then it’s time to say something.

So, here’s something.

YesterdayThe Root ran a piece titled “The Lighter the Skin, the Shorter the Prison Term?”: “Villanova researchers studied more than 12,000 cases of African-American women imprisoned in North Carolina and found that women with lighter skin tones received more-lenient sentences and served less time than women with darker skin tones.”

Why do lighter skinned women get light sentences? According to the study, because they are deemed “more attractive”. If they’re “thinner”, bonus.

That’s “the system”.

That’s “the system” that has inspired almost all the representations of the Guinean hotel worker, asylum seeker, accuser. Those that portray her as “prostitute” or “liar”, and those that presume to know her situation because, after all, she’s from Guinea, and you know, Guinea, it’s full of mud huts, bad men, corruption, and desperate housewives: “She was born in a mud hut in an isolated hamlet in Africa with no electricity or running water, a 10-minute hike to the nearest road.”

Instead of claiming to know her or her story, let’s talk about “African women” who have responded to rape and all forms of sexual violence.

UN Women released a report today that studies women’s pursuit of justice around the world. As you might imagine, it’s a mixed bag. (At least Guinea ratified CEDAW, the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women. What is the only country in the world that has signed but not yet ratified CEDAW? The United States of America. We’re number none.)

One of the report’s recommendations is for “one-stop shops and legal aid”: “Because of the institutional and social barriers that women face, they need specialized services – from legal aid to domestic violence courts – tailored to meet their needs. One promising approach is to integrate services, for example through one-stop shops. These help to reduce attrition by cutting down the number of steps that a woman has to take to access justice.”

The model one-stop shop comes from South Africa, the Thuthuzela Care Centres. In Xhosa, Thuthuzela means “comfort”. In life, it means justice.

The Thutuzela Care Centres care for women who report rape and other forms of sexual violence. They take care of the women and they help the women take care of themselves and of justice. In Soweto, the TCCs have reported a conviction rate of 89%. According to Monique Davis, a TCC manager, in Mannenberg, near Cape Town, the successful conviction rates have gone from around 4 or 5% to 70 or 80%. As Davis says, around the world, women survivors of sexual violence are loathe to pursue criminal proceedings against their attackers. Thuthuzela changes that dynamic.

Place the claims of “the African chambermaid” in that context, in the context of various struggles by different women and women’s groups and networks across the African continent to secure justice and well-being. Justice, not pity.

5 thoughts on “‘The African chambermaid’ and the media

  1. Here you can see the huge collection of lies the chambermaid has been caught with.


    Several of the lies were directed towards the prosecutors and the Grand Jury, and PROVEN false.

    We need a Convention on the Elimination of Discrimination against Men. No good woman, without criminal record, would ever have been jailed upon any unproven, unsubstantiated allegations of a crime, by a man. And then released on 5 Million bail

    It is probably difficult for other guests to come forward and confirm that she works as a prostitute, as they would incriminate themselves for having procured a prostitute.

  2. I am a longtime fan of this blog, but Moshenberg’s piece seems haphazard in its conflation of systems, geographies, and complex legal issues. Neither he nor Ruth Marcus in the WaPo acknowledges the tricky fact that we might question the essentialist media narratives surrounding the “new Heloise” (esp. the absurd NY Times article with the mud huts quoted here), entertain the notion that DSK is guilty, AND have reasonable doubt in the eyes of the law–all at once. Emphasizing justice over pity is fair. By immediately re-absorbing this case into yet another “larger issue,” however, Moshenberg creates the impression that “justice” in any one context must conform to the “rights” and “wrongs” of the social injustices it ties into. Making conviction easier–no matter how unpalatable the due process of witness investigation–is hardly the fix for American criminal justice that I’d imagine AIAC writers would endorse in a less incendiary scenario.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s